The Arc Doesn’t Bend Itself

Justice is what you practice when you can’t control the outcome.

Martin Luther King Jr. has been a hero since I was a kid. His words never felt like history. They’ve always felt like direction.

This line keeps coming back to me when the world feels chaotic and stuck:

“The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.”

Beautiful, right? Also dangerous if you mishear or misinterpret it. It’s easy to turn these words into permission to wait. To assume things will work themselves out.

King didn’t offer these words as comfort or to invite complacency. He meant it as fuel. Progress is possible, but it’s not automatic.

A Time-Tested Perspective

That’s where Stoicism helps. The Stoics are clear-eyed about this: separate what you control from what you don’t. I don’t control institutions, timelines, or what other people choose. I control my judgments, my attention, and my actions. That’s where justice actually lives.

For the Stoics, justice isn’t a slogan. It’s a practice. The discipline of treating people with fairness and dignity. Acting for the common good. Refusing to use people as obstacles or raw material for my own comfort.

It’s Time to Update Our Thinking

Here’s the reality: political, social, and economic injustice can become normal. It gets rationalized, codified, and rewarded. Naming that isn’t about a partisan stance. It’s just an honest assessment based on historical data. And it reminds us of this. Systems drift when individuals outsource their conscience to custom.

A lot of injustice gets defended with a scarcity story: there isn’t enough, so what I have must be protected, even if it costs someone else.

But in our age? Many of those old constraints are weaker. Not all scarcity is gone—but a lot of what we call scarcity is manufactured, assumed, or protected by habit. Information is abundant. Tools are accessible. Opportunities can be created and shared more easily than before. The “there’s no other way” excuse ages poorly. More often, the barrier is fear, habit, and zero-sum thinking.

Your Turn

So the question gets personal:

What does justice look like in the only arena I actually control?

Sometimes it’s telling the truth without weaponizing it—and choosing restraint because I care about impact. Sometimes it’s dealing fairly when I could get away with less—paying what I owe, giving credit, refusing to extract value in ways I’d be ashamed to name. Sometimes it’s widening access where I can: sharing what I know instead of hoarding it, making an introduction, opening a door that costs me little but could matter to someone else.

The Stoics say virtue is its own reward. Not because outcomes don’t matter—but because integrity can’t be rented from the scoreboard. I practice justice because that’s who I’m choosing to be, whether the arc bends quickly or slowly.

And over time, those choices accumulate. Yours, mine, ours. That’s how norms change. How systems eventually follow. That’s the work: you become the thing by doing the thing.

A few questions I’m sitting with today that I invite you to consider with me:

• Where are you waiting for “the system” to do work you could do today?

• What’s one concrete way you can practice justice this week—even if it doesn’t move the needle immediately?

• What do you actually control in your work, relationships, money, voice—and what are you pretending you control that you don’t?

• Where has a scarcity story shaped your choices—and what might shift if you practiced justice from a place of enough?

  ---

  If this kind of reflection helps you think more clearly—and practice what you believe—subscribe so you don’t miss the next post.